Nadia F. Habib-Bein, William H. Beckwith, III, Donald Mayo, and Marie L. Landry. Comparison of SmartCycler Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay in a Public Health Laboratory with Direct Immunofluorescence and Cell Culture Assays in a Medical Center for Detection of Influenza . J. Clin. Microbiol., Aug 2003; 41: 3597 - 3601
Comparison of SmartCycler Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assay in a Public Health Laboratory with Direct Immunofluorescence and Cell Culture Assays in a Medical Center for Detection of Influenza A Virus
Nadia F. Habib-Bein,1,2 William H. Beckwith III,3 Donald Mayo,1,3 and Marie L. Landry1,2*Yale University School of Medicine,1 Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut,2 Connecticut Department of Public Health Laboratory, Hartford, Connecticut3
Received 17 March 2003/ Returned for modification 24 April 2003/ Accepted 23 May 2003
A single-tube real-time (fluorogenic) reverse transcription (RT)-PCR with the SmartCycler instrument (SmartCycler RT-PCR) for influenza A virus detection was evaluated with 238 respiratory specimens. Direct immunofluorescence antibody staining (DFA) and primary rhesus monkey kidney cell culture were performed on-site at Yale-New Haven Hospital. Specimens were transported to the Connecticut Department of Public Health Laboratory for real-time RT-PCR. Cell culture detected influenza A virus in all 150 influenza A virus-positive specimens, DFA detected the virus in 148 influenza A virus-positive specimens, and SmartCycler RT-PCR detected the virus 143 influenza A virus-positive specimens. The sensitivity and specificity of RT-PCR were 95.3 and 100%, respectively. The high sensitivity and specificity and the rapid turnaround time made the SmartCycler RT-PCR valuable for the rapid diagnosis of influenza A, especially in a public health laboratory. The closed real-time RT-PCR system avoided cross-contamination possible with RT-PCR and the excessive manipulations required for conventional RT-PCR analysis and saved time and labor as well. In a medical center, rapid diagnosis by DFA was labor intensive but was 98.7% sensitive and 100% specific compared to the results of culture and provided results within 2 h throughout operating hours, helping with bed allocation on admission and patient management.
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Laboratory Medicine, P.O. Box 208035, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520-8035. Phone: (203) 688-3475. Fax: (203) 688-8177. E-mail: marie.landry@yale.edu.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Evolutionary analysis of Hemagglutinin and neuraminidase gene variation in H1N1 swine influenza virus from vaccine intervention in China 32 minute(s) ago
- Avian raptors are indicator species and victims of high pathogenicity avian influenza virus HPAIV H5N1 (clade 2.3.4.4b) in Germany 33 minute(s) ago
- Genetic and pathological analysis of hooded cranes (Grus monacha) naturally infected with clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus in South Korea in the winter of 2022 35 minute(s) ago
- H1N1 swine influenza viruses upregulate NEU1 expression through histone H3 acetylation regulated by HDAC2 37 minute(s) ago
- [preprint]Enhanced encephalitic tropism of bovine H5N1 compared to the Vietnam H5N1 isolate in mice 44 minute(s) ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]