Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Kanazawa R, Sugii S, Kawaoka Y, Horimoto T. The index influenza A virus subtype H5N1 isolated from a human in 1997 differs in its receptor-binding properties from a virulent avian influenza virus. J Gen Virol. 2004 Apr;85(Pt 4):1001-5
The index influenza A virus subtype H5N1 isolated from a human in 1997 differs in its receptor-binding properties from a virulent avian influenza virus.
Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Kanazawa R, Sugii S, Kawaoka Y, Horimoto T.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
To gain insight into the events that occur when avian influenza viruses are transmitted to humans, the receptor-binding properties of the index H5N1 influenza virus isolated from a human in 1997 and the A/turkey/Ontario/7732/66 (H5N9) virus were compared, by using a haemadsorption assay. Cells expressing the haemagglutinin (HA) of the human isolate were adsorbed by both chicken red blood cells (RBCs) and human RBCs; those expressing the avian virus HA were only adsorbed by chicken RBCs. These results indicate that human and avian influenza virus H5 HAs differ in their recognition of sialyloligosaccharides on the RBCs of different animal species. Mutational analyses indicated that differences in both the oligosaccharide chains and in the amino acid sequences around the HA receptor-binding site were responsible for this difference in receptor binding. These data further support the concept that alteration in receptor recognition is important for replication of avian viruses in humans.
Iwatsuki-Horimoto K, Kanazawa R, Sugii S, Kawaoka Y, Horimoto T.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639, Japan.
To gain insight into the events that occur when avian influenza viruses are transmitted to humans, the receptor-binding properties of the index H5N1 influenza virus isolated from a human in 1997 and the A/turkey/Ontario/7732/66 (H5N9) virus were compared, by using a haemadsorption assay. Cells expressing the haemagglutinin (HA) of the human isolate were adsorbed by both chicken red blood cells (RBCs) and human RBCs; those expressing the avian virus HA were only adsorbed by chicken RBCs. These results indicate that human and avian influenza virus H5 HAs differ in their recognition of sialyloligosaccharides on the RBCs of different animal species. Mutational analyses indicated that differences in both the oligosaccharide chains and in the amino acid sequences around the HA receptor-binding site were responsible for this difference in receptor binding. These data further support the concept that alteration in receptor recognition is important for replication of avian viruses in humans.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Zoonotic infections and genomic evolution of novel reassortant swine influenza A viruses in Spain 20 hours ago
- Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 in a Commercial Turkey Breeder Farm with Structured Entry Biosecurity: A Descriptive Field Investigation 20 hours ago
- Spread of H5N1 Avian Influenza Viruses Clade 2.3.4.4b in the Russian Federation, 2021-2023 20 hours ago
- Update to the CDC influenza A(H3) subtyping assay for improved detection of influenza A(H3N2) viruses, including subclade K viruses 20 hours ago
- Bovine myxovirus resistance protein (Mx)1, but not Mx2, mediates antiviral activity against human and avian influenza A viruses, including H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b 21 hours ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


