Li F, Yang L, Li H, Wang L, Gu L, Malkhazova S. Spatiotemporal distribution trends and driving factors of avian influenza in poultry in China. One Health. 2026 Jun 13;23:101483
Background: Avian influenza viruses can cross species barriers to mammals, spreading among wildlife, domestic animals and humans. Poultry, as a primary host, plays a crucial role in the transmission of avian influenza.
Methods: This study analyzed the temporal patterns and hotspot regions of avian influenza in poultry, examined the distribution trends of major subtypes, identified driving factors on the avian influenza transmission, and assessed their contributions and interactive effect using the XGBoost model.
Results: Poultry avian influenza in China mainly occurred from November to March, with hotspot areas concentrated in southeastern China. The H5 subtype persisted throughout the study period, and its epidemic center gradually shifted eastward. The H7 and H9 subtypes showed different temporal trends in circulation, while H9N2 accounted for the highest number of reported cases. Human activity-related variables, including road network density, population density, GDP and poultry trade points, contributed the most to poultry avian influenza outbreaks. Climate factors ranked the second, with winter precipitation contributing the most. Livestock and poultry farming density ranked the third and waterfowl species density ranked the last. The increase of human activities, livestock and farming densities contributed to a sharp increase in avian influenza risks when the levels of these factors were at low-medium level, while the contribution became stable when the human activities exceeded to certain threshold, and became negative when the livestock and farming densities were extremely high. Further, poultry avian influenza risk was amplified under the combined effects of livestock and poultry farming systems, high waterfowl species density, and strong trade connectivity, suggesting a coupled wild bird-poultry-trade network transmission pattern.
Conclusion: These findings highlight that socioeconomic activities are the major contributors for poultry avian influenza, while climate and waterfowl species density acted as important modifying factors for avian influenza, in particular with livestock and poultry farming density. The study provides a useful framework for identifying potential transmission interfaces and supports more targeted surveillance and prevention strategies under the One Health perspective.
Methods: This study analyzed the temporal patterns and hotspot regions of avian influenza in poultry, examined the distribution trends of major subtypes, identified driving factors on the avian influenza transmission, and assessed their contributions and interactive effect using the XGBoost model.
Results: Poultry avian influenza in China mainly occurred from November to March, with hotspot areas concentrated in southeastern China. The H5 subtype persisted throughout the study period, and its epidemic center gradually shifted eastward. The H7 and H9 subtypes showed different temporal trends in circulation, while H9N2 accounted for the highest number of reported cases. Human activity-related variables, including road network density, population density, GDP and poultry trade points, contributed the most to poultry avian influenza outbreaks. Climate factors ranked the second, with winter precipitation contributing the most. Livestock and poultry farming density ranked the third and waterfowl species density ranked the last. The increase of human activities, livestock and farming densities contributed to a sharp increase in avian influenza risks when the levels of these factors were at low-medium level, while the contribution became stable when the human activities exceeded to certain threshold, and became negative when the livestock and farming densities were extremely high. Further, poultry avian influenza risk was amplified under the combined effects of livestock and poultry farming systems, high waterfowl species density, and strong trade connectivity, suggesting a coupled wild bird-poultry-trade network transmission pattern.
Conclusion: These findings highlight that socioeconomic activities are the major contributors for poultry avian influenza, while climate and waterfowl species density acted as important modifying factors for avian influenza, in particular with livestock and poultry farming density. The study provides a useful framework for identifying potential transmission interfaces and supports more targeted surveillance and prevention strategies under the One Health perspective.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Avian Influenza Weekly Update # 1062: 18 September 2026 9 hours ago
- Effectiveness of the 2025-2026 seasonal influenza vaccine among U.S. veterans: an observational study 11 hours ago
- Streamlined CRISPR-based assays for detection and subtyping of H5 and H7 avian influenza 2 days ago
- Host-specific effects of a pandemic H1N1 M gene on canine H3N2 influenza virus replication and immune responses 2 days ago
- Rapid Decline of Nesting Peregrine Falcons in the San Francisco Bay Region of California Synchronous with an Outbreak of H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza 2 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


