Yang X, Gao Q, Xi Z, Zhao P, Zhao J. Prevalence and Heterogeneity of Swine Influenza Virus in China From 2010 to 2025: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2026 Feb 13;2026:1096796
Background: Swine influenza virus (SIV) is endemic in China, threatening the swine industry and public health. This meta-analysis estimated the national pooled prevalence of SIV (2010-2025) and identified key sources of heterogeneity.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, six databases were searched, yielding 73 eligible studies with 411,930 samples. A random-effects model pooled prevalence estimates, and subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity.
Results: The pooled SIV prevalence was 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5%-36.4%) with extreme heterogeneity (I 2 = 100%, p < 0.001). Key drivers included diagnostic method (serological: 37.1% vs. virological: 2.6%), geography (Southwest China: 54.3%), and viral genotype (H1 > H3). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, but publication bias (Egger´s test, p = 0.0009) suggests potential overestimation.
Conclusion: SIV is widespread in China but exhibits marked spatiotemporal and methodological variability. A single national prevalence figure is insufficient for risk assessment. Surveillance and control strategies must be targeted and context-specific. This study provides a critical, albeit potentially overestimated, epidemiological baseline for evidence-based interventions.
Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, six databases were searched, yielding 73 eligible studies with 411,930 samples. A random-effects model pooled prevalence estimates, and subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity.
Results: The pooled SIV prevalence was 30.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 24.5%-36.4%) with extreme heterogeneity (I 2 = 100%, p < 0.001). Key drivers included diagnostic method (serological: 37.1% vs. virological: 2.6%), geography (Southwest China: 54.3%), and viral genotype (H1 > H3). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness, but publication bias (Egger´s test, p = 0.0009) suggests potential overestimation.
Conclusion: SIV is widespread in China but exhibits marked spatiotemporal and methodological variability. A single national prevalence figure is insufficient for risk assessment. Surveillance and control strategies must be targeted and context-specific. This study provides a critical, albeit potentially overestimated, epidemiological baseline for evidence-based interventions.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Imported case of avian influenza A(H9N2) virus infection in a patient with miliary tuberculosis, Italy, March 2026 21 hours ago
- Characterization and Genetic Evolution of H6N2 Subtype AIV Isolates from Aquatic Birds 1 days ago
- Evaluation of experiences in mass depopulation of upland gamebirds in response to HPAI H5N1 outbreaks in North America: a mixed-methods study 1 days ago
- Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N1) Virus RNA in Bovine Semen, California, USA, 2024 2 days ago
- Rapid expansion of genotype D1.1A(H5N1) influenza viruses in wild birds across North America during the 2024 migratory season 2 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


