Khakurel U, Sattenspiel L, Mamelund S-E. Role of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions during 1918~1920 Influenza Pandemic, Alaska, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2025 Jul
Previous studies investigating the 1918~1920 influenza pandemic have provided a comprehensive overview of the spread of the pandemic and possible explanations for high mortality rates in Alaska, USA. Our understanding of the role of nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is limited, however. To gain an overview of various agencies’ efforts to protect communities during the pandemic, we conducted a mixed-method assessment of a large pool of digitized historical newspapers and archival materials covering Alaska’s local and territorial responses to the pandemic. The study encompassed 14 local units of Alaska that implemented NPIs during October 1918~January 1919. Analyses indicated that 8 local units avoided the outbreak by implementing NPIs and that the other 6 units controlled the spread of influenza by implementing NPIs after the virus was introduced. In addition, some Indigenous communities escaped the pandemic by implementing mandatory and voluntary restrictions. Information on NPI effects of could guide future influenza pandemic preparedness and response.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- IFN-gene signatures in B cells following influenza A and B virus infection and influenza vaccination 14 hours ago
- Continuous phylogeography reveals shifting environmental drivers of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5 spread in Italy, 2016-2023 14 hours ago
- Zoonoethics and Inclusive One Health Governance for H5N1 Panzootic: From Animal Culling to Co-responsibility 14 hours ago
- Porcine influenza mAbs to H3, H5 and H7 hemagglutinins recognise H3 egg adapted site and target the HA stem 14 hours ago
- Multi-Strategy Collaborative Improvement of an H5N1 Viral-Inspired Optimization Algorithm for Mobile Robot Path Planning 14 hours ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


