Beer E, Boyd S, Wongnak P, Ngamprasertchai T, Whit. A comparison of national seasonal influenza treatment guidelines across the Asia Pacific region. PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Apr 28;5(4):e0004468
Seasonal influenza leads to 2-3 million infections and up to 650,000 global deaths annually, with particularly high mortality in Asia and relatively low annual vaccination rates for prevention. Relatively lower attention is paid to antiviral treatment as a facet of influenza response strategy both in research and national policy. This study compares national influenza treatment guidelines across countries in the Asia Pacific region, and assesses the antiviral recommendations, comprehensiveness, availability, and quality, compared with World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines. Ministry of Health websites were searched, and key stakeholders were contacted to obtain national influenza treatment guidelines. Official guidelines detailing pharmacologic treatment for seasonal influenza were included. Key data for comparison were extracted and quality appraisal was conducted using the AGREE II instrument. Out of 49 countries and areas in the World Health Organisation Western Pacific and South-East Asia regions, under half (14/49; 28.6%) had established national influenza treatment guidelines. Nine (9/49; 18.4%) reported no seasonal flu guidelines at all, and information could not be obtained for 25 (51.0%). All guidelines recommend oseltamivir in line with WHO recommendations, although rationale and evidence reviews were often missing. There was variation in recommendations for other antivirals, indications for treatment, definitions of severity and recency of publication. The AGREE II tool quality assessments revealed the highest average scores were observed in the ´presentation´ domain and lowest scores in ´editorial independence´ and ´rigour of development´ domains, demonstrating limited evidence-based guideline development. The variability in recommendations and definitions highlight the need for a stronger evidence base with direct comparisons of antiviral treatment for hard and soft endpoints, and improvements in systematic guideline development. Established treatment guidelines are a key component of national influenza response strategy and in the post-covid pandemic era, renewed attention to seasonal influenza management is surely warranted.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Engineered Bacillus subtilis to deliver dsRNA via extracellular vesicles against the H9N2 avian influenza virus 3 hours ago
- [preprint]Spatiotemporal dynamics and ecological risk factors of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in Canadian wildlife: A One Health surveillance analysis 3 hours ago
- Epidemiological and Virological Characteristics of H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus in Jiangsu Province, China, 2024 15 hours ago
- Innate Pathway Selection Modulates Antibody and T-Cell Responses to Mosaic Influenza Nucleoprotein in Cattle 1 days ago
- Game Over for the Baseline: Influenza Hospitalization Patterns Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic (FluSurv-NET, 2009–2025) 1 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


