BI Fuyin, KANG Ning, HUANG Hang, HE Weitao, JYU Yu. Analysis of surveillance results of avian influenza virus in the poultry-related environment in Guangxi, 2021~2022. DOI:10.13604/j.cnki.46-1064/r.2024.05.14
Objective To monitor and analyze the avian influenza virus contamination in the environment outside the poultry-related places in Guangxi, and to assess the risk of human infection with avian influenza viruses, so as to provide a scientific basis for the prevention and control of avian influenza in Guangxi.
Methods From 2021 to 2022, environmental samples from 5 kinds of poultry-related sites were collected monthly in 14 cities of Guangxi. The real-time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR method was used to detect the nucleic acids of generic influenza A viruses, and H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of avian influenza virus. The detection results of avian influenza virus in the environment of the poultry-related sites in Guangxi were collected for retrospective analysis. SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis, and the chi-square test was used to compare the rates.
Results From 2021 to 2022, a total of 5 960 environmental samples were collected in 14 cities, of which 3 918 were positive for influenza A virus nucleic acid, with a positive rate of 65.74%; Among the positive samples, 281 were positive for H5 subtype (7.17%), 2 508 were positive for H9 subtype (64.01%), 552 were positive for H5+H9 subtype (14.09%), 577 were positive for type A but not H5/H7/H9 (14.73%), and no subtype H7 was detected. The positive rate of influenza A in poultry related environment samples was higher throughout the year in Guangxi; except for Wuzhou, which had a similar number of H5, H9, and A non-H5/H7/H9 subtypes, the H9 subtype was predominantly detected in other cities. There was significant variability in positive rates among different regions, with the highest being in Hezhou City (90.32%, 653/723) and the lowest in Yulin City (28.96%, 75/259). The positive rate of different specimen types ranged from 50.32% to 74.94%. There were statistically significant differences in the positive rates of samples from different types of samples (χ2=163.08, P<0.001), different months (χ2=172.69, P<0.001), different regions (χ2=498.86, P<0.001), different monitoring sites (χ2=370.01, P<0.001).
Conclusions There is severe contamination of avian influenza virus in the poultry-related environment in Guangxi, predominantly with the H9 and H5 subtypes. Therefore, the relevant authorities in Guangxi should strengthen the monitoring, management, and disinfection of poultry-related premises.
Methods From 2021 to 2022, environmental samples from 5 kinds of poultry-related sites were collected monthly in 14 cities of Guangxi. The real-time fluorescent quantitative RT-PCR method was used to detect the nucleic acids of generic influenza A viruses, and H5, H7, and H9 subtypes of avian influenza virus. The detection results of avian influenza virus in the environment of the poultry-related sites in Guangxi were collected for retrospective analysis. SPSS 22.0 was used for data analysis, and the chi-square test was used to compare the rates.
Results From 2021 to 2022, a total of 5 960 environmental samples were collected in 14 cities, of which 3 918 were positive for influenza A virus nucleic acid, with a positive rate of 65.74%; Among the positive samples, 281 were positive for H5 subtype (7.17%), 2 508 were positive for H9 subtype (64.01%), 552 were positive for H5+H9 subtype (14.09%), 577 were positive for type A but not H5/H7/H9 (14.73%), and no subtype H7 was detected. The positive rate of influenza A in poultry related environment samples was higher throughout the year in Guangxi; except for Wuzhou, which had a similar number of H5, H9, and A non-H5/H7/H9 subtypes, the H9 subtype was predominantly detected in other cities. There was significant variability in positive rates among different regions, with the highest being in Hezhou City (90.32%, 653/723) and the lowest in Yulin City (28.96%, 75/259). The positive rate of different specimen types ranged from 50.32% to 74.94%. There were statistically significant differences in the positive rates of samples from different types of samples (χ2=163.08, P<0.001), different months (χ2=172.69, P<0.001), different regions (χ2=498.86, P<0.001), different monitoring sites (χ2=370.01, P<0.001).
Conclusions There is severe contamination of avian influenza virus in the poultry-related environment in Guangxi, predominantly with the H9 and H5 subtypes. Therefore, the relevant authorities in Guangxi should strengthen the monitoring, management, and disinfection of poultry-related premises.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Protocol for enhanced human surveillance of avian influenza A(H5N1) on farms in Canada 9 hours ago
- Evolutionary analysis of Hemagglutinin and neuraminidase gene variation in H1N1 swine influenza virus from vaccine intervention in China 10 hours ago
- Avian raptors are indicator species and victims of high pathogenicity avian influenza virus HPAIV H5N1 (clade 2.3.4.4b) in Germany 10 hours ago
- Genetic and pathological analysis of hooded cranes (Grus monacha) naturally infected with clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus in South Korea in the winter of 2022 10 hours ago
- H1N1 swine influenza viruses upregulate NEU1 expression through histone H3 acetylation regulated by HDAC2 11 hours ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]