Liqi Liu, etc.,al. Comparison of the growth characteristics of influenza subtype H10 reassortant viruses in different cells. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1003-9279.2016.01.020
Objective: To evaluate the cells for producing vaccine of avian influenza H10 subtype, the growth characteristics of influenza H10 subtype reassortant viruses in different cells (MDCK and Vero) were investigated.
Methods: Reassortant viruses, RG-H10N1(7+ 1) and RG-H10N8(6+ 2), between wild-type virus A/Jiangxi-donghu/346/2013(JXH10N8) and high-yielding virus A/ Puerto Rico/ 8/ 34(PR8) were constructed with reverse genetic system. Viruses were propagated in SPF embryonated chicken eggs. The growth characteristics of the two reassortant viruses were compared after inoculating MDCK and Vero cells respectively, with RG-PR8 as the control. Viral growth characteristics were studied at different MOI in MDCK cells.
Results: All viruses could be detected TCID 50 in MDCK cells. RG-PR8 and RG-H10N1could be detected TCID 50 in Vero cells but not RG-H10N8. There were no significant difference in HA titer between the two reassortant viruses at the same MOI, but both reassortant viruses exhibited lower HA titers than that of PR8 in MDCK cells.
Conclusion: Both influenza H10 subtype reassortant viruses grew better in MDCK cells. MDCK cells are more sensitive to the influenza H10 reassortant viruses, and NA from different subtypes could affect the grow capability of reassortant viruses in Vero cells.
Methods: Reassortant viruses, RG-H10N1(7+ 1) and RG-H10N8(6+ 2), between wild-type virus A/Jiangxi-donghu/346/2013(JXH10N8) and high-yielding virus A/ Puerto Rico/ 8/ 34(PR8) were constructed with reverse genetic system. Viruses were propagated in SPF embryonated chicken eggs. The growth characteristics of the two reassortant viruses were compared after inoculating MDCK and Vero cells respectively, with RG-PR8 as the control. Viral growth characteristics were studied at different MOI in MDCK cells.
Results: All viruses could be detected TCID 50 in MDCK cells. RG-PR8 and RG-H10N1could be detected TCID 50 in Vero cells but not RG-H10N8. There were no significant difference in HA titer between the two reassortant viruses at the same MOI, but both reassortant viruses exhibited lower HA titers than that of PR8 in MDCK cells.
Conclusion: Both influenza H10 subtype reassortant viruses grew better in MDCK cells. MDCK cells are more sensitive to the influenza H10 reassortant viruses, and NA from different subtypes could affect the grow capability of reassortant viruses in Vero cells.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Protocol for enhanced human surveillance of avian influenza A(H5N1) on farms in Canada 6 hours ago
- Evolutionary analysis of Hemagglutinin and neuraminidase gene variation in H1N1 swine influenza virus from vaccine intervention in China 8 hours ago
- Avian raptors are indicator species and victims of high pathogenicity avian influenza virus HPAIV H5N1 (clade 2.3.4.4b) in Germany 8 hours ago
- Genetic and pathological analysis of hooded cranes (Grus monacha) naturally infected with clade 2.3.4.4b highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus in South Korea in the winter of 2022 8 hours ago
- H1N1 swine influenza viruses upregulate NEU1 expression through histone H3 acetylation regulated by HDAC2 8 hours ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]