Haiyan Huang, etc.,al. Status of environmental contamination by avian influenza virus in farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district of Guangzhou. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4092.2021.02.016
ObjectiveTo describe the characteristics of avian influenza virus contamination in farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district form January 2019 to June 2020, and to analyze the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on contamination of the markets by avian influenza virus.
MethodsRandom sampling and testing of avian influenza virus nucleic acids were carried out for farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Influenza A virus positive samples were further detected for subtypes of H5, H7 and H9. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data.
ResultsA total of 1 978 samples were tested and the overall positive rate was 31.24% (618/1 978), while H9 subtype accounted for 92.07% (569/618). The difference of the positive rates in 2019 and 2020 was not statistically significant (x2=0.052, P=0.082). Among different types of samples, the positive rate of samples collected from the inner wall of feather removal machines was the highest (44.08%), while the positive rate of samples collected from inner wall of freezers was the lowest (13.33%).
ConclusionsH9 was dominant subtype of avian influenza virus responsible for contamination of farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Samples collected from the sites with direct contact with live poultry were more likely to detect avian influenza virus. The positive rates of avian influenza virus before and after the COVID-19 pandemics showed no statistically significant difference. Strengthened regulatory management of the farmers’ markets is recommended.
MethodsRandom sampling and testing of avian influenza virus nucleic acids were carried out for farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Influenza A virus positive samples were further detected for subtypes of H5, H7 and H9. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data.
ResultsA total of 1 978 samples were tested and the overall positive rate was 31.24% (618/1 978), while H9 subtype accounted for 92.07% (569/618). The difference of the positive rates in 2019 and 2020 was not statistically significant (x2=0.052, P=0.082). Among different types of samples, the positive rate of samples collected from the inner wall of feather removal machines was the highest (44.08%), while the positive rate of samples collected from inner wall of freezers was the lowest (13.33%).
ConclusionsH9 was dominant subtype of avian influenza virus responsible for contamination of farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Samples collected from the sites with direct contact with live poultry were more likely to detect avian influenza virus. The positive rates of avian influenza virus before and after the COVID-19 pandemics showed no statistically significant difference. Strengthened regulatory management of the farmers’ markets is recommended.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Engineered Bacillus subtilis to deliver dsRNA via extracellular vesicles against the H9N2 avian influenza virus 8 hours ago
- [preprint]Spatiotemporal dynamics and ecological risk factors of highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) in Canadian wildlife: A One Health surveillance analysis 8 hours ago
- Epidemiological and Virological Characteristics of H9N2 Avian Influenza Virus in Jiangsu Province, China, 2024 19 hours ago
- Innate Pathway Selection Modulates Antibody and T-Cell Responses to Mosaic Influenza Nucleoprotein in Cattle 2 days ago
- Game Over for the Baseline: Influenza Hospitalization Patterns Before, During, and After the COVID-19 Pandemic (FluSurv-NET, 2009–2025) 2 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]


