Haiyan Huang, etc.,al. Status of environmental contamination by avian influenza virus in farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district of Guangzhou. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4092.2021.02.016
ObjectiveTo describe the characteristics of avian influenza virus contamination in farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district form January 2019 to June 2020, and to analyze the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on contamination of the markets by avian influenza virus.
MethodsRandom sampling and testing of avian influenza virus nucleic acids were carried out for farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Influenza A virus positive samples were further detected for subtypes of H5, H7 and H9. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data.
ResultsA total of 1 978 samples were tested and the overall positive rate was 31.24% (618/1 978), while H9 subtype accounted for 92.07% (569/618). The difference of the positive rates in 2019 and 2020 was not statistically significant (x2=0.052, P=0.082). Among different types of samples, the positive rate of samples collected from the inner wall of feather removal machines was the highest (44.08%), while the positive rate of samples collected from inner wall of freezers was the lowest (13.33%).
ConclusionsH9 was dominant subtype of avian influenza virus responsible for contamination of farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Samples collected from the sites with direct contact with live poultry were more likely to detect avian influenza virus. The positive rates of avian influenza virus before and after the COVID-19 pandemics showed no statistically significant difference. Strengthened regulatory management of the farmers’ markets is recommended.
MethodsRandom sampling and testing of avian influenza virus nucleic acids were carried out for farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Influenza A virus positive samples were further detected for subtypes of H5, H7 and H9. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis of the data.
ResultsA total of 1 978 samples were tested and the overall positive rate was 31.24% (618/1 978), while H9 subtype accounted for 92.07% (569/618). The difference of the positive rates in 2019 and 2020 was not statistically significant (x2=0.052, P=0.082). Among different types of samples, the positive rate of samples collected from the inner wall of feather removal machines was the highest (44.08%), while the positive rate of samples collected from inner wall of freezers was the lowest (13.33%).
ConclusionsH9 was dominant subtype of avian influenza virus responsible for contamination of farmers’ markets in Zengcheng district. Samples collected from the sites with direct contact with live poultry were more likely to detect avian influenza virus. The positive rates of avian influenza virus before and after the COVID-19 pandemics showed no statistically significant difference. Strengthened regulatory management of the farmers’ markets is recommended.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Emergence of HPAI H5N6 Clade 2.3.4.4b in Wild Birds: A Case Study From South Korea, 2023 17 hours ago
- Age-Dependent Pathogenesis of Influenza A Virus H7N9 Mediated Through PB1-F2-Induced Mitochondrial DNA Release and Activation of cGAS-STING-NF-κB Signaling 17 hours ago
- Genotypic Clustering of H5N1 Avian Influenza Viruses in North America Evaluated by Ordination Analysis 17 hours ago
- Protocol for enhanced human surveillance of avian influenza A(H5N1) on farms in Canada 1 days ago
- Evolutionary analysis of Hemagglutinin and neuraminidase gene variation in H1N1 swine influenza virus from vaccine intervention in China 1 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]