Pillsbury AJ, et al. Active surveillance of 2017 seasonal influenza vaccine safety: an observational cohort study of individuals aged 6 months and older in Australia. BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e023263.
OBJECTIVE:
To actively solicit adverse events experienced in the days following immunisation with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine using Australia´s near real-time, participant-based vaccine safety surveillance system, AusVaxSafety.
DESIGN AND SETTING:
Observational cohort study conducted in 194 sentinel surveillance immunisation sites (primary care, hospital and community-based clinics) across Australia.
PARTICIPANTS:
Individuals aged ≥6 months who received a routine seasonal influenza vaccine at a participating site (n=102?911) and responded to a survey (via short message service or email) sent 3 days after vaccination about adverse events experienced (n=73?892; 71.8%).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Near real-time and cumulative participant-reported rates of any adverse event, fever or medical attendance experienced within 3 days after vaccination overall, by brand, age, pregnancy status and concomitant vaccine receipt.
RESULTS:
Participant median age was 57 years (range: 6 months to 102 years); 58.1% (n=42?869) were female and 2.7% (n=2018) were pregnant. Near real-time fast initial response cumulative summation and Bayesian analyses of weekly event rates did not demonstrate a safety signal. Children aged 6 months to 4 years had higher event rates (522/6180; 8.4%) compared with older ages; participants aged ≥65 years reported fewer events (1695/28 154; 6.0%). There were no clinically significant differences in safety between brands, by age group or overall. Cumulative data analysis demonstrated that concomitant vaccination was associated with increased rates of fever (2.1% vs 0.8%) and medical attendance (0.8% vs 0.4%), although all rates were low and did not exceed expected levels.
CONCLUSIONS:
Novel, postmarketing AusVaxSafety surveillance demonstrated comparable and expected safety outcomes for the 2017 quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine brands used in Australia. These near real-time, participant-reported data are expected to encourage confidence in vaccine safety and promote uptake.
To actively solicit adverse events experienced in the days following immunisation with quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine using Australia´s near real-time, participant-based vaccine safety surveillance system, AusVaxSafety.
DESIGN AND SETTING:
Observational cohort study conducted in 194 sentinel surveillance immunisation sites (primary care, hospital and community-based clinics) across Australia.
PARTICIPANTS:
Individuals aged ≥6 months who received a routine seasonal influenza vaccine at a participating site (n=102?911) and responded to a survey (via short message service or email) sent 3 days after vaccination about adverse events experienced (n=73?892; 71.8%).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Near real-time and cumulative participant-reported rates of any adverse event, fever or medical attendance experienced within 3 days after vaccination overall, by brand, age, pregnancy status and concomitant vaccine receipt.
RESULTS:
Participant median age was 57 years (range: 6 months to 102 years); 58.1% (n=42?869) were female and 2.7% (n=2018) were pregnant. Near real-time fast initial response cumulative summation and Bayesian analyses of weekly event rates did not demonstrate a safety signal. Children aged 6 months to 4 years had higher event rates (522/6180; 8.4%) compared with older ages; participants aged ≥65 years reported fewer events (1695/28 154; 6.0%). There were no clinically significant differences in safety between brands, by age group or overall. Cumulative data analysis demonstrated that concomitant vaccination was associated with increased rates of fever (2.1% vs 0.8%) and medical attendance (0.8% vs 0.4%), although all rates were low and did not exceed expected levels.
CONCLUSIONS:
Novel, postmarketing AusVaxSafety surveillance demonstrated comparable and expected safety outcomes for the 2017 quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine brands used in Australia. These near real-time, participant-reported data are expected to encourage confidence in vaccine safety and promote uptake.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- Mapping of stakeholders in avian influenza surveillance in Canada 11 hours ago
- [preprint]Population Immunity to Hemagglutinin Head, Stalk and Neuraminidase of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza 2.3.4.4b A(H5N1) viruses in the United States and the Impact of Seasonal Influenza on 23 hours ago
- Airborne Influenza Virus Surveillance Platform Using Paper-Based Immunosensors and a Growth-Based Virus Aerosol Concentrator 23 hours ago
- [preprint]A Human H5N1 Influenza Virus Expressing Bioluminescence for Evaluating Viral Infection and Identifying Therapeutic Interventions 2 days ago
- [preprint]A Live Attenuated Vaccine Candidate against Emerging Highly Pathogenic Cattle-Origin 2.3.4.4b H5N1 Viruses 2 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]