Rodriguez-Lainz A, et.,al. Influenza vaccination coverage among US-Mexico land border crossers: 2009 H1N1 pandemic and 2011-2012 influenza season. Travel Med Infect Dis. 2018 Oct 5.
BACKGROUND:
The high volume of US-Mexico land border crossings can facilitate international dissemination of influenza viruses.
METHODS:
We surveyed adult pedestrians crossing into the United States at two international land ports of entry to assess vaccination coverage during the 2009H1N1 influenza pandemic and 2011-2012 influenza season.
RESULTS:
Of 559 participants in 2010, 23.4% reported receipt of the 2009H1N1 vaccine. Of 1423 participants in 2012, 33.7% received the 2011-2012 influenza vaccine. Both years, those crossing the border ≥8 times per month had lower vaccination coverage than those crossing less frequently. US-border residents had lower H1N1 coverage than those in other locations. Vaccination coverage was higher for persons age ≥65 years and, in 2010 only, those with less than high school education. Although most participants believed it is important to get vaccinated, only half believed the influenza vaccine was safe and effective. The main reasons for not receiving the influenza vaccine were beliefs of low risk of disease, time constraints, and concerns about vaccine safety (in 2010) or efficacy (in 2012).
CONCLUSIONS:
International land border crossers are a large and unique category of travelers that require targeted binational strategies for influenza vaccination and education.
The high volume of US-Mexico land border crossings can facilitate international dissemination of influenza viruses.
METHODS:
We surveyed adult pedestrians crossing into the United States at two international land ports of entry to assess vaccination coverage during the 2009H1N1 influenza pandemic and 2011-2012 influenza season.
RESULTS:
Of 559 participants in 2010, 23.4% reported receipt of the 2009H1N1 vaccine. Of 1423 participants in 2012, 33.7% received the 2011-2012 influenza vaccine. Both years, those crossing the border ≥8 times per month had lower vaccination coverage than those crossing less frequently. US-border residents had lower H1N1 coverage than those in other locations. Vaccination coverage was higher for persons age ≥65 years and, in 2010 only, those with less than high school education. Although most participants believed it is important to get vaccinated, only half believed the influenza vaccine was safe and effective. The main reasons for not receiving the influenza vaccine were beliefs of low risk of disease, time constraints, and concerns about vaccine safety (in 2010) or efficacy (in 2012).
CONCLUSIONS:
International land border crossers are a large and unique category of travelers that require targeted binational strategies for influenza vaccination and education.
See Also:
Latest articles in those days:
- The Limited Role for Antiviral Therapy in Influenza 52 minute(s) ago
- Pathogenesis of bovine H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b infection in Macaques 2 hours ago
- [preprint]Susceptibility of bovine respiratory and mammary epithelial cells to avian and mammalian derived clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses 1 days ago
- Genetic Diversity of H10N3 Avian Influenza Virus Isolated from Anhui Province, China 1 days ago
- Molecular origion of human infection with a novel avian influenza A H10N3 virus in China, 2021 1 days ago
[Go Top] [Close Window]